[2025-10-22T16:45:00+01:00] User Prompt
"What is the halting problem?"
The Halting Problem asks whether there exists a single algorithm that, given any program P and input x, can determine whether P(x) will eventually halt or run forever. Alan Turing (1936) proved that such a universal termination-decider does not exist; the problem is undecidable.
H(P, x) returns TRUE if P(x) halts, FALSE otherwise.K(Q): run H(Q, Q); if TRUE, loop forever; if FALSE, halt.K(K). If H says it halts, K loops; if H says it loops, K halts. Contradiction.Therefore, H cannot exist.
| Gödel (1931) | Turing (1936) |
|---|---|
| True but unprovable statements in arithmetic | Well-posed problems no algorithm can solve (undecidable) |
| Arithmetization of syntax | Programs encoded as data; machines as strings |
| Self-reference via diagonalization | Self-reference via program-on-its-own-code |
The results are philosophically parallel: both show limits to formal systems and computation.
| Area | Implication |
|---|---|
| Software verification | No tool can decide termination/correctness for all programs. |
| AI predictability | No algorithm can perfectly predict the behavior of all other algorithms (or itself) in general. |
| Mathematics | Some mathematical truths are non-computable; echoes of incompleteness. |
| Security analysis | No universal detector for all infinite loops or malware behaviors. |
Chaitin’s Ω (Omega) is the halting probability of a universal prefix-free machine; its binary expansion is algorithmically random and encodes answers to infinitely many halting instances. This links undecidability to algorithmic information theory.
A “perfect critic” that reads any book and tells whether it mentions itself creates a paradox when handed its own title. The halting problem is that paradox in code: a procedure that decides termination for all programs generates a program that contradicts it by asking about itself.
The halting problem shows that computation has intrinsic limits: no algorithm solves termination for all programs. This boundary is not a bug but a structural feature of logic and computation.